• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
The influences of gravitation and viscoelasticity on coseismic and postseismic deformation in the Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. PHYSICS, 2009, 38(04): 254-260.
Citation: The influences of gravitation and viscoelasticity on coseismic and postseismic deformation in the Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. PHYSICS, 2009, 38(04): 254-260.

The influences of gravitation and viscoelasticity on coseismic and postseismic deformation in the Wenchuan Earthquake

More Information
  • Published Date: April 19, 2009
  • The co-seismic and post-seismc deformations of the Wenchuan Earthquake are calculated with the software PSGRN/PSCMP and compared with the observed GPS data. The differential displacements of the half-space elastic and viscoelastic layering models during time gaps ≤ 10 years illustrate the influence of viscosity on the post-seismic deformation. The lower the viscous crust that is chosen, the higher the postseismic deformation obtained. The crust velocity derived from the lower viscous model is ~4mm/yr, which is faster than the relative motion across the Longmenshan fault according to the GPS observation, and therefore indicates that local movements originating from the low viscous crust and mantle should not be neglected. We conclude that lower viscosity of the lower crust and mantle results in higher postseismic deformation of the upper crust. This conclusion is consistent, to some extent, with several recent studies which suggested that the Wenchuan Earthquake was mainly caused by deep processes beneath the Longmenshan fault.
  • Related Articles

    [1]MA Teng-Fei, WU Zhong-Liang, YANG Xiao-Lin. Video recording of classroom evacuation during the April 20,2013,Lushan,Sichuan,China,earthquake: preliminary analysis and implication for the statistical physical models of escape panic[J]. PHYSICS, 2013, 42(05): 341-345. DOI: 10.7693/wl20130505
    [2]JIANG Hui, WU Zhong-Liang, MA Teng-Fei, JIANG Chang-Sheng. Retrospective test of the PI forecast:case study of the April 20,2013,Lushan,Sichuan,China,MS7.0 earthquake[J]. PHYSICS, 2013, 42(05): 334-340. DOI: 10.7693/wl20130504
    [3]MA Teng-Fei, WU Zhong-Liang. Physical and seismological challenges in numerical earthquake forecasting: a discussion on the key issues in the physics of earthquakes[J]. PHYSICS, 2013, 42(04): 256-262. DOI: 10.7693/wl20130403
    [4]SHI Yao-Lin, ZHANG Bei, ZHANG Si-Qi, ZHANG Huai. Numerical earthquake prediction[J]. PHYSICS, 2013, 42(04): 237-255. DOI: 10.7693/wl20130402
    [5]Quake lakes in the Wenchuan Earthquake and challenging mechanical problems[J]. PHYSICS, 2009, 38(04): 248-253.
    [6]The physics of earthquake prediction[J]. PHYSICS, 2009, 38(04): 233-237.
    [7]Tsunamis,earthquake-generated tsunamis and tsunamigenic earthquakes[J]. PHYSICS, 2005, 34(12): 864-872.
    [8]Physics for the reduction of earthquake disasters[J]. PHYSICS, 2005, 34(03): 176-180.
    [9]From springandblock to earthquake prediction:an introduction to the burridgeknopoff model for the physics of earthquakes[J]. PHYSICS, 2002, 31(11).
    [10]Earthquake prediction and statistical physics[J]. PHYSICS, 2002, 31(06).

Catalog

    Article views (42) PDF downloads (1279) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return